@mc_ I have always thought a nice niche for OSS monetization is that on the low end there are folks that tinker, develop, maybe make a few bucks off the efforts. But for those that are making any real money, they MUST help fund the development. I mean how would you count on something with your millions on VC if you didn't have skin in the game? I mean, how can they do that and then what if there is a problem or if kazoo disappeared? Like I have said to a few clients before "You want me to make money". Cause if I don't, I fold, and then you have nothing. I understand saving a buck, and for a small guy with say 100 extensions, they can't really justify a $5K - $20K / month expenditure. But when they get big enough to have 10,000 extensions, then they better be helping on the develpment, and funding. Finding that middle ground, I admit is difficult. From what I've seen from other OSS projects are those that are making their serious money from it, realize they must pay maintenance contracts to keep their stuff working, and getting custom code done to supplement things. Sometimes some limit how much is out with the OSS, and the other parts are commercial. Then they get paid from the commerical as well as contracts.