-
Posts
154 -
Joined
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Resource Library: Monster UI Apps for KAZOO
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by Baze
-
-
37 minutes ago, Jim_PGi said:
@baze is it possible to change the recording that plays for a forwarded call on a per-call basis?
Well technically anything is possible I suppose? You'd have to change the recording file itself which I've not done before. But once it is changed it should just pull that file instead of the existing one.
-
Kind of confused - you are using broadsoft as the back end phone system? This forum is for 2600hz (a competitor back end) although who knows, maybe they are working on something I'm not aware of. I can certainly tell you how to do that with the 2600hz backend, but no clue how to use broadsoft.
-
Just now, avig2 said:
So G711 for the ultimate quality then?
Well technically G722 is higher "quality" but sometimes it throws people off, also keep in mind it only really matters for internal calls - external calls get transcoded to G711 anyways.
-
7 minutes ago, Karl Stallknecht said:
IMHO Polycom speakerphone is superior to pretty much anything out there, but that's my biased opinion 🙂
Agree with you - but they just can't compete with that pretty silver metal accent and big beautiful screen. ha!
-
TBH in our testing lawyers (again to the high maintenance thing) seem to prefer the normal G711 sound. Any change to that is a problem - we even once had to tweak sidetone settings on the VVX 500 series because they couldn't "hear themselves" talking in the handset. Opus is great, but ultimately for compatibility we settled on plain old G722 for clients that don't mind the HD sound.
-
We use both extensively. Lawyers love the T48S from experience. They are so high maintenance, ha!
-
Hey Jack - the router definitely wouldn't affect things. There are a number of things I know we've seen here, but specifically you might look at your phone configs and see if you can increase the "handset volume" which makes the phones transmit a louder stream. Pretty much every model of phone will have that. Obviously the speaker or handset volume on the receiving end should be checked to see if they have their volume up. If it keeps resetting to a medium volume, there are settings usually to allow for "fixing" the default volume to be higher or to remember the last setting.
Here is the setting we use to set the microphone gain (volume) of the phones for Polycom:
voice.gain.tx.digital.handset
Here are our Polycom settings to make sure the volume settings remember the last settings:
voice.volume.persist.handset="1"
voice.volume.persist.headset="1"
voice.volume.persist.handsfree="1"
voice.volume.persist.usb.handsfree="1"
voice.volume.persist.usbHeadset="1" -
Have you tried upgrading to the 5.9.1 firmware and re-testing? there were quite a few caller id fixes there.
-
We've done it this way and turned off the "invalid menu" recording and it does seem to work well (with your above flow).
-
Ha!!! Yes, you should be a technical writer in your next life.
-
oh boy - that is interesting, yeah. Definitely this is the 48 only - here is the line in their changelog:
21. Added the feature of English onscreen keyboard on T48G/T48S IP phone.
-
2 minutes ago, esoare said:
FYI: I tried the **+ext on a T42S running V83.0.10 and the call transfered fine.
esoare
Perfect! Thank you - that definitely reinforces that this looks to just be a T48G/S problem. Phew!
-
Alright, always best to answer my own questions here. - this looks to be ONLY with the T48G and T48S. Here is the config line to fix it:
phone_setting.virtual_keyboard.enable = 0
Was a setting added in V83 to allow an english keyboard onscreen.
-
Side note - did some firmware testing here, and the issue first appears in the v83 firmware, so don't go past 82.0.30 if you want to avoid this.
-
Hey All - wondering if anyone has come across this one yet. By default, 2600 is set for **+ext to be the "call direct to voicemail" option. On older firmware versions of Yealink this worked fine. After updating to 35.83.0.50, the dial pad now does an IME style thing where it cycles through, so if you hit ** you end up getting a . instead. We've tried modifying the ime.text (language) file to no avail. Got a ticket in with Yealink because at the very least this seems poorly executed or at least should have a config option. Not sure what firmware version the hosted platform runs either.
Anyone run across this or have a fix not involving downgrading firmware or manually changing that star code on all clients? Thanks in advance!
-
Yep! that is the one. If they aren't using smartpbx, you don't have much of a downfall. The main issue with modifying those callflows is they can be "regenerated", but looks like at least for the 0 it won't affect things like it did. So in your case, you should be able to remove from there, save, and then go in and create a new callflow using 0 and have it do whatever you need.
-
^true - just keep in mind the user has to be logged in as super duper because you will have to remove the 0 from the main callflow first which is an automatic one. Otherwise you will get a "must use unique" error when building the new callflow. It does look like smartpbx will rebuild without giving an error though which is great! Before if you tried to hijack 0 to a new advanced callflow you'd get an error when you went back to smartpbx.
-
By default if using smartpbx, pressing 0 will transfer back to the main callflow. If you want something other than that, you'd have to make a custom advanced callflow for the user, and then you can have their "voicemail" be a menu instead which gives any option.
-
I believe you can't do this, no. Most of the carriers now are rejecting any non-normal caller ID because of the huge spam calling issues we've been seeing. We recommend clients turn on the "Press 1 to accept the call" feature or use a softphone which you can send callerID info to.
-
You can definitely use them, just need to contact 2600 to get setup with a contract and then they will get them added to your cluster.
-
Those apps are closed source iirc.
-
Ahhhh - yeah, unfortunately not to on the system to my knowledge. Beauty of 2600hz is that basically everything is possible if you have someone that knows how to do it.
-
Not out of the box, but that would be a really cool thing to build out in a pivot and could likely be done that way I bet. Cool idea!
-
Caller ID info on VM
in Product Discussion
Posted · Edited by Baze (see edit history)
If you find out let me know! We actually have this on our radar to try and develop because I don’t think it is possible now.