Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
If I intentionally send a fax email to one of my faxboxes from an unauthorized Gmail account, no bounce message or response is ever sent back to the Gmail account. On Hotmail and Yahoo though it returns a bounce error. Not sure if this has to do with some sort of email authentication checking on Google's part or what.

Also though, the bounce messages that are returned are very vague and don't explicitly state "this user/email is not authorized to send faxes" - is this vagueness intentional or not?
  • Administrators
Posted
FYI, we are aware of this and it will improve over time. The main challenge here is unauthorized emails actually might be spam attempting to generate "back scatter". This is a common spam tactic where a spammer intentionally emails a known server that will "bounce" emails, using a forged From: address. This inherently generates a reply to the spammer's target in the form of a bounce.
  • Administrators
Posted
Ironically, the current mechanism is to reject the email outright. The error you're receiving is from whomever sends your email to us - they don't even get far enough where we generate a bounce-back.

In other words, we deny the SMTP connection.

That, inherently, is the problem. We have no opportunity to customize the message much. We can add about 100 characters of clarifying text which may, or may not, end up in the response that YOUR email provider generates to you. But there's no guarantee you'll see anything.

We're working on ideas for this.
Posted
Sorry, I was not clear. I do indeed understand that as that is the nature of bounce messages. What I meant was is there a reason why you don't accept it and then generate your own error? For example if non-clients attempt to email our support ticketing system, our own system generates an email and sends it back to them stating that they are not a registered client and therefore cannot email us. I do realize though that this could become very resource intensive if a lot of non-clients were emailing us, but I assume you don't have nearly enough volume for that to become an issue with faxboxes.
Posted
I understand what backscatter is just fine. What I was referring to was something different and I don't think you interpreted my response correctly, but the bottom line is that you're working on it so it doesn't matter at this point.
×
×
  • Create New...